Skip to Main Content
Damage Assessment, Remediation, and Restoration Program (DARRP) - PartnershipsNOAA Logo
         
This site NOAA

Northeast Region
Northwest Region
Southeast Region
Southwest Region
Great Lakes Region
Partnerships
Archives
Glossary
Related Websites
Home


Department of Commerce Logo

Related Documents
Cooperative Assessment Process (CAP)

Using Environmental Conflict Resolution in Natural Resource Damage Assessments

Working through conflicts involves a range of Environmental Conflict Resolution (ECR) methods. Unlike traditional litigation, in which a judge or jury determines recoverable damages, alternative methods of assisted negotiation — such as facilitation, mediation, and conflict assessment — allows stakeholders to reach a mutually satisfactory agreement without judicial intervention.

ECR saves time and avoids traditional legal costs. And, as an additional value –added result: stakeholders working toward a shared, positive outcome can often achieve more mutually agreeable results than they would have received in court.

The information provided here is meant as a starting point for natural resource trustees to consider how ECR may be used in a Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA). NOAA encourages you to learn as much as possible about ECR in the hope of enhancing negotiations and decision making in NRDA. More information available from EPA .

Environmental Conflict Resolution
On November 28, 2005, Joshua Bolten, Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and James Connaughton, Chairman of the President's Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), issued a policy memorandum on Environmental Conflict Resolution (ECR). This Joint Policy Statement directs agencies to increase the effective use of ECR and their institutional capacity for collaborative problem solving. It includes a definition of ECR and sets forth "Basic Principles for Agency Engagement in Environmental Conflict Resolution and Collaborative Problem Solving". It also includes a compilation of mechanisms and strategies that may be used to achieve the stated policy objectives.

Finding a Mediator or Facilitator
A neutral third party, such as a mediator or facilitator, can often be helpful in preventing and resolving conflict. Neutral third parties play a variety of roles, including facilitating discussions, providing parties with a "reality check" on the merits and value of their claims, assisting with creative problem solving, and writing agreements that reflect the needs of the parties.

A list of potential sources for neutral third parties is provided below for informational purposes.

  • National Roster of Environmental Dispute Resolution and Consensus Building Professionals

    The National Roster of Environmental Dispute Resolution and Consensus Building Professionals is a source of information for identifying neutral third parties and matching them to appropriate disputes. The U.S. Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution and U.S. EPA jointly designed and initiated the Roster. The Roster is continuously open and contains information on many individuals who have met the qualifications with regard to experience in managing environmental disputes.

  • EPA Conflict Prevention and Resolution Services Contract

    All EPA headquarters, regional, and field offices can use this contract to obtain expert services in conflict or issues assessment, public participation or stakeholder involvement activities, consensus building, and collaborative processes, and alternative dispute resolution processes. This contract mechanism may possibly benefit trustee interests when integrating restoration and remedial processes.

  • Native Dispute Resolution Network

    The Native Dispute Resolution Network is a developing resource for those seeking assistance from a collaborative conflict resolution practitioner where American Indian, Alaska Native, or Native Hawaiian people and environmental, natural resources, or public/trust lands (including cultural property and sacred sites) issues are involved.

  • Non-Competitive Procurement of Neutral Third Parties

    The Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996 and the Federal Acquisition Regulations allow Federal agencies to use other than full competitive procedures to procure the services of an expert or neutral third party for use in alternative dispute resolutions processes. This option can be less burdensome and time-consuming when parties are interested in the acquiring the services of a specific neutral third party, but is only available for small purchases.

Note: Private parties may have greater flexibility in accessing neutral third parties, an option that should be considered.

Useful ECR Links

Important ECR Documents

  • Public Involvement
  • Related Documents
  • Contacts
  • Additional Links
  • Partnerships Home
The Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF documents. Click on the Acrobat Reader icon to download the latest version.

Adobe Acrobat Reader